Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/10975
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Damodaran, Appukuttan | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-03-23T09:25:14Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-03-23T09:25:14Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2009 | - |
dc.identifier.issn | 0921-8009 | - |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/10975 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Project Tiger has been India's premier case of conservation success. Since mid 1990s select Project Tiger Reserves in India were chosen for intensive funding by the Global Environment Facility, the International Development Agency (IDA) and the Government of India under the 'India Eco-Development Project'. This project marked a modest shift towards debt based funding. The GEF Project has become a benchmark for tiger conservation in India both in terms of management outcomes and scale and scope of funding. However in the absence of large-scale budgetary support or self-generating income flows, it becomes difficult for the GEF type of project to be replicated in other tiger reserves of the country. Debt instruments hold promise as enablers of conservation finance. The paper proposes issue of 'tiger bonds' to meet the financial requirements of tiger reserves. Though attractive as a debt instrument, a 'tiger bond' could nevertheless entail interest rate and default risks. Bioprospecting activities form good revenue sources for tiger reserves to pay off their debts. However bioprospecting activities do not provide assured returns to tiger reserves. Pharmaceutical companies that prospect for genetic resources and practice 'real options' approach to R&D investment planning, adopt multi-phased investment systems and sequential searches that gives them the flexibility to abandon R&D projects. From the point of view of genetic resource providing entities like Project Tiger Reserves, the 'postponement value' generated by real options, enables a drug company to tap substitutes for the genetic resources that form the subject matter of bioprospecting contracts. To obviate possible repayment risks by tiger reserves, the paper advocates the institution of 'putbonds' as a risk management tool for Project Tiger Reserves in order to hedge themselves against loan defaults arising from possible loss in bioprospecting income. The paper also brings out the mechanics of the issue of tiger bonds in the Indian context. It is argued that a put bond not only hedges default risks but would also aid 'value discovery' and payment for ecosystem services as far as the Project Tiger Reserves of India are concerned. (C) 2008 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved. | - |
dc.publisher | Elsevier Science Bv | - |
dc.subject | Project Tiger | - |
dc.subject | Tiger Bonds | - |
dc.subject | Value Added Services | - |
dc.subject | Strike Price | - |
dc.subject | Real Options | - |
dc.subject | Put Option | - |
dc.subject | Conservation Expenditure | - |
dc.title | Risk management instruments for debt driven conservation efforts: the case of India's project tiger | - |
dc.type | Journal Article | - |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.09.001 | - |
dc.pages | 625-633p. | - |
dc.vol.no | Vol.68 | - |
dc.issue.no | Iss.3 | - |
dc.journal.name | Ecological Economics | - |
Appears in Collections: | 2000-2009 |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.