Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/10981
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Qaim, M | |
dc.contributor.author | Subramanian, A | |
dc.contributor.author | Naik, Gopal | |
dc.contributor.author | Zilberman, D | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-03-23T09:25:15Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-03-23T09:25:15Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2006 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1058-7195 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/10981 | - |
dc.description.abstract | There is a growing body of literature about the impacts of Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) cotton in developing countries. While many studies show remarkable benefits for farmers, there are also reports that question these results. Most previous studies consider impacts in deterministic terms, neglecting existing variability. Here we explain the main factors influencing the agronomic and economic outcomes. Apart from differences in pest pressure and patterns of pesticide use, germplasm effects can play an important role. Theoretical arguments are supported by empirical evidence from India. Better understanding of impact variability can help explain some of the paradoxes in the recent controversy over genetically modified crops. | |
dc.publisher | Amer Agricultural Economics Assoc | |
dc.subject | Textiles industry | |
dc.subject | Cotton industry | |
dc.subject | Agriculture | |
dc.title | Adoption of BT cotton and impact variability: insights from India | |
dc.type | Journal Article | |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/j.1467-9353.2006.00272.x | |
dc.pages | 48-58p. | |
dc.vol.no | Vol.28 | - |
dc.issue.no | Iss.1 | - |
dc.journal.name | Review of Agricultural Economics | |
Appears in Collections: | 2000-2009 |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.