Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/11720
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMunshi, Soumyanetra
dc.date.accessioned2020-04-21T13:40:18Z-
dc.date.available2020-04-21T13:40:18Z-
dc.date.issued2011
dc.identifier.issn1043-4062
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/11720-
dc.description.abstractThis paper presents an alternative theoretical perspective on democratization. Various models of democratization have been proposed in the literature, like enfranchisement in response to threats of revolution, threats of war, and split of interests among elites. However, there seems to be instances of democratization that do not follow any of these patterns. For one, these theories rely on redistributive aspects of franchise extension. My model captures democratization arising out of an evenly-balanced partisan competition between political parties, large rents from office and a part of the enfranchised benefiting from extension of franchise. Hence I can explain instances of suffrage extension with little or no redistributive repercussions like women’s suffrage. My model also fits the democratization experiences of several countries like Sweden, Chile, and Italy.
dc.publisherSpringer
dc.subjectDemocratization
dc.subjectEnfranchisement
dc.subjectExtension Of Suffrage
dc.subjectWomen'S Suffrage
dc.titleEnfranchisement from a political perspective
dc.typeJournal Article
dc.identifier.doi10.1007/S10602-010-9091-7
dc.pages21-57p.
dc.vol.noVol.22-
dc.issue.noIss.1-
dc.journal.nameConstitutional Political Economy
Appears in Collections:2010-2019
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check

Altmetric


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.