Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/12135
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRanganathan, V-
dc.date.accessioned2020-05-08T13:59:42Z-
dc.date.available2020-05-08T13:59:42Z-
dc.date.issued2006-
dc.identifier.issn0012-9976-
dc.identifier.issn2349-8846-
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/12135-
dc.description.abstractIt appears that the courts did not look at the substantive issues behind the allegations that excess land was acquired for the Bangalore Mysore Infrastructure Corridor. The courts seem to have gone by the Karnataka government's assurance that only a minimum amount of land was given to the company. Bad governments need not act in public interest and may indeed abuse their "eminent domain" powers and aid and abet "eminent thievery".-
dc.publisherSameeksha Trust-
dc.subjectPublic policy-
dc.subjectPublic Administration-
dc.subjectKarnataka government-
dc.subjectInfrastructure development-
dc.subjectBangalore Mysore Infrastructure Corridor-
dc.titleEminent Domain or Eminent Thievery?-
dc.typeJournal Article-
dc.pages2697-2700p.-
dc.vol.noVol.41-
dc.issue.noIss.26-
dc.journal.nameEconomic and Political Weekly-
Appears in Collections:2000-2009
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
Ranganathan_EPW_2006_Vol.41_Iss.26.pdf453.91 kBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.