Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/13040
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Krishnan, Rishikesha T | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-07-07T14:58:59Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-07-07T14:58:59Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2012-05-26 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/13040 | - |
dc.description | Outlook Business, 26-05-2012 | |
dc.description.abstract | One company, two contrasting experiences. Where the Nano has struggled to live up to its pre-launch hype, just a few years earlier, the success of the Ace caught Tata Motors completely by surprise. So much so that the company scrambled to set up a new plant to meet demand. Are there lessons to be learnt from these two extreme experiences?. Read more at: https://www.outlookbusiness.com/perspective/different-drivers-2215 | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Outlook Publishing (India) Pvt.Ltd | |
dc.subject | Automobile industry | |
dc.subject | Tata motors | |
dc.title | Different drivers: Why the Tatas succeeded with the Ace but not with the Nano | |
dc.type | Magazine and Newspaper Article | |
dc.identifier.url | https://www.outlookbusiness.com/perspective/different-drivers-2215 | |
dc.pages | 16-17p. | |
dc.journal.name | Outlook Business | |
Appears in Collections: | 2010-2019 |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.