Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/13845
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ansari, Sana | |
dc.contributor.author | Mani, Dalhia | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2020-08-14T15:15:39Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2020-08-14T15:15:39Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2019 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/13845 | - |
dc.description.abstract | The field of social networks focuses on the relationships among social actors, and on patterns that emerge from the structure of the social network and its implications (Wasserman and Faust’s Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications). Social network research argues that actors (e.g., individuals or firms) are embedded within a network of relations, and that their behavior and choices cannot be studied independent of the social relations that shape and structure behavior. Social network perspective views relations among the social actors as ties and regular patterns in relationship as structure. Ties are the relational linkages that allow flow of resources between the actors, both tangible and intangible. Multiple actors form a web of relational ties, which can be either economic, social, or political. Networks can be of different types based on the content of the relational tie between the actors. For instance, collaboration ties between actors make a collaboration network or a co-author relation between actors makes a co-authorship network. Networks can also be at different levels of analysis—for instance, an intraorganizational friendship network is at the level of individuals while a network of intercountry trade relations is at the level of country. Ties between actors can be of different strengths (for instance, friends who meet daily versus once a year) and can also be negative or positive ties (e.g., competition networks versus collaboration networks). This article summarizes the latest research on social ties and network structure by focusing on the main thematic discussions in the field: (1) networks and strategic, governance behavior; (2) workplace networks; (3) collaboration and knowledge networks; (4) networks, personality, and individual differences; (5) entrepreneurial and family business networks; and (6) networks and social media. To ensure a comprehensive review of the topic, the article used search keywords, “networks,” or “network structure,” or “social networks,” or “social ties,” and was limited to articles in the top fourteen management journals, namely: Academy of Management Journal, Strategic Management Journal, Organization Science, Management Science, American Journal of Sociology, American Sociological Review, Administrative Science Quarterly, Academy of Management Review, Journal of Management Studies, Journal of Business Venturing, and Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. The search was further limited to the six-year period from 2014–2019, since previous articles on organizational networks and brokerage in Oxford Bibliographies have summarized the research in this domain prior to 2014. | |
dc.language.iso | en_US | |
dc.publisher | Oxford University Press | |
dc.subject | Behavioural science | |
dc.subject | Behavioural study | |
dc.subject | Social networks | |
dc.subject | Social ties | |
dc.title | Management social ties and network structure | |
dc.type | Other Publication | |
dc.identifier.url | https://www.oxfordbibliographies.com/view/document/obo-9780199846740/obo-9780199846740-0186.xml | |
dc.journal.name | Oxford Bibliographies | |
Appears in Collections: | 2010-2019 |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.