Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/19165
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Munshi, Soumyanetra | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-05-17T12:34:10Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-05-17T12:34:10Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/19165 | - |
dc.description.abstract | It is well known that in a voting-over-income-taxation game, there exists no pure strategy equilibrium when voters’ incomes are exogenous (i.e., when individual voters make only consumption choices). I prove that in an environment with endogenous income (i.e., where individual voters make labor-leisure choices, in addition to consumption choices) and candidates propose marginally progressive taxes, it is possible to get existence of a pure-strategy equilibrium tax schedule. | |
dc.subject | Indifference curve | |
dc.subject | Condorcet winner | |
dc.subject | Pure strategy equilibrium | |
dc.subject | Labor choice | |
dc.subject | Exogenous income | |
dc.title | On existence of pure strategy equilibrium with endogenous income | |
dc.type | Presentation | |
dc.relation.conference | Eastern Economic Association Meeting, 26-28 February, 2010, Philadelphia | |
Appears in Collections: | 2010-2019 P |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.