Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
https://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/21108
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Srinivasan, Vasanthi | |
dc.contributor.author | Jain, Abhinav | |
dc.contributor.author | Bakshi, Gandharv S | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-03-31T08:02:12Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-03-31T08:02:12Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2010 | |
dc.identifier.uri | https://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/21108 | - |
dc.description.abstract | A significant amount of work, from Management thinkers and practitioners alike, has gone into the art of defining a good strategy. However, history is replete with examples of good strategy gone wrong. In fact, failure due to poor execution can be more painful as compared to failure due to a poor strategy – poor execution is often harder to correct and causes of poor execution are more often than not systemic. Further, a good strategy can be formulated in relatively shorter time, an ideal recipe for companies dealing with the pressures of Quarter-over-Quarter analyst calls. On the contrary, good execution is harder to demonstrate in a short span and by the time the results of good execution come out, it could be months if not years | |
dc.publisher | Indian Institute of Management Bangalore | |
dc.relation.ispartofseries | PGP_CCS_P10_265 | |
dc.subject | Strategy execution challenges | |
dc.subject | A behavioural approach | |
dc.title | Organization wide performance measurement System | |
dc.type | CCS Project Report-PGP | |
dc.pages | 20p. | |
Appears in Collections: | 2010 |
Files in This Item:
File | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|
PGP_CCS_P10_265_OBHR.pdf | 1.17 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open Request a copy |
Google ScholarTM
Check
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.