Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/21314
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorDas, Gopal
dc.contributor.authorSwain, Shripragnya
dc.contributor.authorKamble, Tanvi
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-01T12:29:27Z-
dc.date.available2022-07-01T12:29:27Z-
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/21314-
dc.description.abstractThis study examines how brand success is affected when brand extension is carried out in a hedonic product as opposed to a utilitarian product. The identified brands in focus were Sabyasachi and Lifestyle and the extension was carried out in perfumes and bathing bar for both brands. It also explores the preferential choice of customers between small packaging and large packaging when brand extension in hedonic product takes place. Brand success for extension in hedonic product i.e., perfumes surpassed success in extension in utilitarian product i.e., bathing bar. Small packaging was favored for hedonic products.
dc.publisherIndian Institute of Management Bangalore
dc.relation.ispartofseriesPGP_CCS_P21_112
dc.subjectBrand management
dc.subjectProduct management
dc.subjectHedonic products
dc.subjectUtilitarian products
dc.subjectConsumer behaviour
dc.subjectPackaging
dc.subjectPurchasing behaviour
dc.titleBrand extension of hedonic vs utilitarain products
dc.typeCCS Project Report-PGP
dc.pages33p.
Appears in Collections:2021
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
PGP_CCS_P21_112.pdf3.96 MBAdobe PDFView/Open    Request a copy
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.