Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/8182
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRaghunandan, K-
dc.contributor.authorNarayanaswamy, R-
dc.date.accessioned2019-07-09T06:01:11Z-
dc.date.available2019-07-09T06:01:11Z-
dc.date.issued2019-
dc.identifier.otherWP_IIMB_582-
dc.identifier.urihttp://repository.iimb.ac.in/handle/2074/8182-
dc.description.abstractIn India, the government introduced mandatory audit firm rotation following calls to improve audit quality and auditor independence in the wake of the Satyam accounting scandal. The absence of strong institutional mechanisms to prevent and detect audit failure in a timely manner has led the government to require periodical audit firm rotation. Evidence from firms for the years 2014 to 2017 suggests that mandatory audit firm rotation does not appear to have improved audit quality, reduced audit costs and increased audit market competition.-
dc.language.isoen_US-
dc.publisherIndian Institute of Management Bangalore-
dc.relation.ispartofseriesIIMB Working Paper-582-
dc.subjectAuditor changes-
dc.subjectAudit fees-
dc.subjectAudit quality-
dc.subjectAudit market concentration-
dc.titleThe effect of mandatory audit firm rotation on audit quality, audit fees and audit market concentration: evidence from India-
dc.typeWorking Paper-
dc.pages31p.-
Appears in Collections:2019
Files in This Item:
File SizeFormat 
WP_IIMB_582.pdf1 MBAdobe PDFView/Open
Show simple item record

Google ScholarTM

Check


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.